On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Kotya
Karapetyan <[hidden email]>
> As of today, a total of 16 votes have been
submitted, 11 of them are
> approvals. Since 2 weeks have passed and the
required number of votes
> (15) has been reached, I have closed the voting and
will proceed with
> clean up.
In fact, the proposal passed the wiki vote ONLY because
the three people voted no at the
last minute. If it were not for those 'no' votes, the
proposal would have failed.
All that shows in part how dysfunctional the wiki vote
It also show how dysfunctional this group is .. not many of you
I would suggest
1) Continued membership of this group be conditional on voting on
at least half the tags presented for voting over say the last
2) Rejoining members be conditional on voting on at least 8 of the
next 10 tags presented for voting.
3) Tag voting may only cease when at least 25%? of the tag group
members have voted and 3? weeks have elapsed.
The old saying .. vote early, vote often springs to mind. Be
carefull of the options in No 3 .. if you make the time short and
the voting numbers small people may not be able to meet the
conditions of No 1 or No2 !!!!
Yes .. it makes the admin more complex. But it will
get some to say something, and get others off the group. Flame