openjdk 8 vs openjdk 10

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

openjdk 8 vs openjdk 10

Bernd Weigelt
Hi

got these message when i use openjdk10 to create the map.
openjdk 8 is patchlevel 161, which has errors in JavaFX, so i  changed to
openjdk 10 for tests

Both files didn't exist, because they are complete in the north sea

II: building basemap

Time started: Sat May 12 09:14:02 CEST 2018
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N52E003.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N52E003.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/
N52E003.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/N52E003.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/
N52E003.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/N52E003.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N55E007.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N55E007.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/
N55E007.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/N55E007.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/
N55E007.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/N55E007.zip
Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0
Number of ExitExceptions: 0
Time finished: Sat May 12 09:53:36 CEST 2018
Total time taken: 39 minutes 33 seconds

This ist the output from openjdk8 with the same tiles from splitter, openjdk 8
is much faster and there are no messages

II: building basemap

Time started: Sat May 12 10:28:36 CEST 2018
Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0
Number of ExitExceptions: 0
Time finished: Sat May 12 10:56:13 CEST 2018
Total time taken: 27 minutes 36 seconds


Bernd
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

dach_areas.list (46K) Download Attachment
template.args (34K) Download Attachment
dach.kml (320K) Download Attachment
signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: openjdk 8 vs openjdk 10

Gerd Petermann
Hi Bernd,

please post the mkgmap version and the mkgmap options.
I do not understand with what run time version you see the problems.
You wrote 8 for both.
Reg. JavaFX: This is not used in splitter or mkgmap, but probably with JOSM.

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von Bernd Weigelt <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Mai 2018 11:24:53
An: [hidden email]
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] openjdk 8 vs openjdk 10

Hi

got these message when i use openjdk10 to create the map.
openjdk 8 is patchlevel 161, which has errors in JavaFX, so i  changed to
openjdk 10 for tests

Both files didn't exist, because they are complete in the north sea

II: building basemap

Time started: Sat May 12 09:14:02 CEST 2018
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N52E003.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N52E003.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/
N52E003.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/N52E003.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/
N52E003.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/N52E003.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N55E007.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N55E007.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/
N55E007.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/N55E007.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/
N55E007.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/N55E007.zip
Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0
Number of ExitExceptions: 0
Time finished: Sat May 12 09:53:36 CEST 2018
Total time taken: 39 minutes 33 seconds

This ist the output from openjdk8 with the same tiles from splitter, openjdk 8
is much faster and there are no messages

II: building basemap

Time started: Sat May 12 10:28:36 CEST 2018
Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0
Number of ExitExceptions: 0
Time finished: Sat May 12 10:56:13 CEST 2018
Total time taken: 27 minutes 36 seconds


Bernd
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: openjdk 8 vs openjdk 10

Gerd Petermann
In reply to this post by Bernd Weigelt
Hi all,

I can reproduce the error messages with Oracle JRE 10 (java version "10.0.1" 2018-04-17)

It seems that the class ZipFile was changed so that it throws a different exception when a file doesn't exist. I think I have to change a few places in the source
to make splitter and mkgmap compatible with that, and maybe there are more pitfalls. So, please don't use those JRE with these programs for now.

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[hidden email]> im Auftrag von Bernd Weigelt <[hidden email]>
Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Mai 2018 11:24:53
An: [hidden email]
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] openjdk 8 vs openjdk 10

Hi

got these message when i use openjdk10 to create the map.
openjdk 8 is patchlevel 161, which has errors in JavaFX, so i  changed to
openjdk 10 for tests

Both files didn't exist, because they are complete in the north sea

II: building basemap

Time started: Sat May 12 09:14:02 CEST 2018
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N52E003.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N52E003.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/
N52E003.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/N52E003.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/
N52E003.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030345.o5m: failed to
get size for file N52E003.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/N52E003.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N55E007.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/COPERNICUS/
N55E007.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/
N55E007.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW1/N55E007.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/
N55E007.hgt.zip
SCHWERWIEGEND (HGTReader): /home/bernd/map_build/tiles/65030398.o5m: failed to
get size for file N55E007.hgt from /home/bernd/map_build/hgt/VIEW3/N55E007.zip
Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0
Number of ExitExceptions: 0
Time finished: Sat May 12 09:53:36 CEST 2018
Total time taken: 39 minutes 33 seconds

This ist the output from openjdk8 with the same tiles from splitter, openjdk 8
is much faster and there are no messages

II: building basemap

Time started: Sat May 12 10:28:36 CEST 2018
Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0
Number of ExitExceptions: 0
Time finished: Sat May 12 10:56:13 CEST 2018
Total time taken: 27 minutes 36 seconds


Bernd
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev