shop=underwear vs shop=clothes + clothes=underwear

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

shop=underwear vs shop=clothes + clothes=underwear

Mateusz Konieczny-3
Is there any good reason to use

shop=underwear

rather than

shop=clothes + clothes=underwear

?

Both describe shop selling primarily underwear, second case seems to be
more universal to me.

than
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=underwear

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: shop=underwear vs shop=clothes + clothes=underwear

Philip Barnes
And shops just selling underwear usually describe themselves as lingerie.

Phil (trigpoint)

On Tuesday, 26 March 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:

> Is there any good reason to use
>
> shop=underwear
>
> rather than
>
> shop=clothes + clothes=underwear
>
> ?
>
> Both describe shop selling primarily underwear, second case seems to be
> more universal to me.
>
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=underwear <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=underwear> is also far more popular
> than
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=underwear
>

--
Sent from my Sailfish device
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: shop=underwear vs shop=clothes + clothes=underwear

Lionel Giard
I think that the shop=underwear could be deprecated indeed, as the other tag is similar and more used (and probably more practical as it is a sub-category of clothes shops). 

For the underwear or lingerie name, both value are existing for "clothes=*" (depending if only selling for women or (also) for men). 

Le mar. 26 mars 2019 à 13:29, Philip Barnes <[hidden email]> a écrit :
And shops just selling underwear usually describe themselves as lingerie.

Phil (trigpoint)

On Tuesday, 26 March 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> Is there any good reason to use
>
> shop=underwear
>
> rather than
>
> shop=clothes + clothes=underwear
>
> ?
>
> Both describe shop selling primarily underwear, second case seems to be
> more universal to me.
>
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=underwear <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=underwear> is also far more popular
> than
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=underwear
>

--
Sent from my Sailfish device
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging